disciplemaking not church planting

I want to share an entry from another organic church leader’s that simply says what I think most church practitioners don’t really get. It’s a continuation of my entry “the people are the product“. It’s the fact that we’re out to make disciples and not plant churches. When I was working my way through the church planting training mechanism of our denomination, I constantly heard, “The only way to evangelize the United States is through saturation church planting.” Which means, we need to plant as many churches as possible [specifically institutional style churches with a hip makeover]. Because new churches always are geared towards evangelism and old churches are geared towards taking care of their own. So the only way is to just keep planting as many as financially possible.

But that misses the point all together – because: first, new churches of that stripe aren’t necessarily evangelizing/disciplemaking more so than they are working to get more people in the building; and secondly it’s then wrongly assuming that building more institutions leads to more disciples. That is a lie of the devil – the same as having a nice home leads to whole and healthy families. Maybe sorta… but really, no.

Roger Thoman’s post is simply reminding us that our goal and heart and passion should be making disciples… helping them fall deeply in love with Jesus, follow him with reckless abandon and then help them help others… and continuing the viral nature of the Gospel through the world. Check it out.

Discipling Viral Disciplers
By Roger Thoman
Originally Posted HERE

I no longer try to start simple/house churches.  I think house churches are great.  They provide a place for people to experience participatory, everyone-matters church life.  They provide a way for people to really connect into authentic, one-another community.  They often provide a place for people to recover from some of the pains caused by institutional church life.  But house churches are no longer the end game for me.

Jesus invited us to join him, organically, in the reproduction of life. His church is a living, thriving, reproducing organism (Mark 4) that allows life-in-the-Spirit to spread virally from one disciple to the next.  His church is alive as illustrated by a seed (Mark 4) that brings forth 30, 60, or 100-fold reproduction.  That is the life of the kingdom.  His life in me is passed on to the life of another (2-fold) which is passed to the life of another (4-fold) which is passed to the life of another (8-fold), etc.  That is the way of organic/viral life and this is what the kingdom IS.  This is ultimately what Jesus invited us to become part of: discipling viral disciplers.

Kingdom life is viral, organic, and, by nature, a movement.

When I have made house churches the end game, I have discovered that they do not naturally reproduce nor become movements.  In fact, house churches have a shelf life.  They may serve a purpose for a season, but when that season ends (and it will) the “movement” is over.  The influence of a house church is temporary.

This explains why Jesus did not ask us to go and “make gatherings or churches.”  He did not ask us to go and “make house churches.”  He said, “go and make disciples.”  This shift from starting gatherings to making disciples (who go and make disciples) goes to the very heart of the matter.  Discipling viral disciplers is the end game.  This places us squarely in the midst of reproductive life that the kingdom is intrinsically about.  We become movement-starters not church-starters.  We release disciples who will influence the world throughout their lifetime and beyond as those they disciple disciple still others

Now, not to confuse the issue, but often in the work of discipling viral disciplers I will be gathering people together in a manner that looks an awful lot like a simple/house church.  Absolutely!  But the underlying DNA makes all the difference. When I reach and disciple a viral discipler, that person is going to gather with other viral disciplers for encouragement, and then, as each of them reaches others, still more gatherings will take place.  So, along the way, house churches are started.  But, but rather than being the end game, they become a means to support the life that is being reproduced from one disciple to the next.  The house church gatherings themselves will shift, change, morph, end, and re-establish themselves in new forms but the movement of disciples who are reproducing disciples will continue.

Sustainable kingdom-life does not take place just because of the way we gather.  But it does take place when we step into the role Jesus called us to: making disciples who know how to make disciples.

As mentioned, starting house churches and discipling viral disciplers (who gather in house churches) might look very similar on the outside.  But the process is very different!  When we start house churches, our focus tends to be on the gathering—what to do, how to do it, what it looks like, etc.  We say to ourselves that we are learning to “be” the church 24/7 (and we may even go do missional things), but often our priority remains on developing the structure/form of simple house church gatherings.  When following Jesus and inviting others to follow him becomes our focus (discipling viral disciples), we will have to shift from the “gathering” mentality to the “lifestyle-going” mentality.  This shift changes the processes we walk out from top to bottom.  And, this shift will propel us from being church-starters to movement starters (where churches spring up along the way).

There is much more to share about the process of discipling viral disciplers, but suffice it to say that it does ask us to examine our own “followership” as a starting point.  Jesus, the adventurous, undomesticated, on-the-move God invites us to join him daily where He is working.  What does that look like for me today?  What does it really mean for me, today, to be the church (Jesus’ follower) in the world?  From that starting point, we can begin to look at and grasp a process that will “infect” others who will then “infect” others to fully follow Jesus.  Ah… a movement!

More to come!

3 thoughts on “disciplemaking not church planting

  1. Hi Elton,

    I realized I hadn’t visit your blog for awhile and hence, I’m commenting on an older entry.

    This entry got me thinking…

    I’m curious as to how your view, if at all, would change if there was a church that does raise up a lot of evangelizing/disciplemaking people…

    I’m assuming that most pastors who plant churches would agree that church planting is the end goal..the means by which to produce radical disciples…

    Holla.

  2. HAH, shoot, I should reviewed my comment before publishing – please ignore that last one. Below is the edited version:

    I realized I hadn’t visited your blog for awhile and hence, I’m commenting on an older entry.

    This entry got me thinking…

    I’m curious as to how your view, if at all, would change if there was a church that does raise up a lot of evangelizing/disciple-making Christ-followers…

    I’m assuming that most pastors who plant churches would agree that church planting is NOT the end goal..but rather the means God uses to produce radical disciples…

    Your thoughts?

    1. ben – great to hear from you…

      so making disciples that make disciples is the end goal… regardless of the form or whether churches are planted. i just think that we’ve always started backwards. we plant churches to make disciples… as opposed to seeing how to make disciples and allowing the church part to come from that. and the methodology for “planting churches” in the past few decades hasn’t been about making disciples… more so then it’s been about gathering a crowd.

      an analogy being like striving to be a doctor and thinking that’ll make you happy. instead of thinking first what makes us happy, what is true to who i am and then moving from there.

      i don’t think that all “institutional” type churches need to be dismantled and house churches are the only way to go. no way actually. but i think the important initial questioning is this… what is a disciple of jesus and how am i helping people become these disciples?

      we start there and then revise our forms accordingly whether we’re doing big church or smaller church. the form serves the function. not the other way around. in which case, regardless of the form… if we’re producing disciples, then that’s the way to go. organic or institutional… though institutional churches will have some very organic flavor if it’s really producing disciples. and organic churches will find that they need a little more structure than they thought.

      i realize too that the “what is a disciple of jesus?” question is more important that i thought. i asked that question to a veteran pastor recently… and his response was this:

      christians who bring friends to church
      christians who help their friends know jesus

      it’s not all wrong… but for many pastors, it always inadvertently begins with bringing people to church. if that’s the #1 thing that comes out of our mouths… it’s a hint as to what’s most important to us and we’ll being structuring everything around what’s most important to us.

      last i checked “bringing friends to church” is nowhere in the bible. nowhere.

      thanks ben… i’m not 100% sure now that i responded to your question. if not, throw something back out. thanks and hope you’re doing well in austin.

      i’ll be in austin next week btw for the verge conference! if you’re free – we can meet up. let me know.

Leave a comment